Patient engagement is now expected across health systems — but expectation does not equal legitimacy.

When patient-led approaches are introduced without clear governance, accountability, or decision authority, they can create ethical exposure, reputational risk, and long-term loss of trust.

Independent advisory support helps organisations distinguish between meaningful engagement and symbolic inclusion, anticipate unintended consequences, and make patient-related decisions that are credible and sustainable.

  • Bookshelves filled with books in a library or bookstore.

    For Global NGOs, international health organisations and foundations

    I advise NGOs, foundations, and international health organisations on the governance, ethics, and system-level consequences of patient-led approaches.

    This includes:

    - Reviewing whether patient engagement structures are genuinely representative and accountable

    - Advising on power dynamics between institutions, funders, and patient communities

    - Supporting leadership in navigating internal disagreement or ethical tension

    - Helping organisations balance advocacy goals with credibility, legitimacy, and long-term trust

    My role is to work with organisations operating across regions and political contexts, where patient engagement carries both opportunity and risk.

  • A dark background with scattered small white particles resembling snow or dust in a swirling pattern.

    For Pharmaceutical, biotech, and life‑sciences companies

    I support pharmaceutical, biotech, and life-sciences organisations in navigating patient-related decisions that carry reputational, regulatory, or ethical risk.

    This includes:

    - Assessing the legitimacy and credibility of patient engagement strategies

    - Identifying ethical and reputational risk in patient advisory boards or partnerships

    - Advising on governance models for patient engagement initiatives

    - Supporting leadership teams ahead of high-visibility launches, collaborations, or public commitments

    - Stress-testing assumptions where patient engagement is used as evidence of responsibility or trustworthiness

    My role is to provide independent judgment before decisions are finalised.

  • Dark image with indistinct outlines of hands reaching upward and faint light source in upper left corner.

    For Multi‑stakeholder initiatives and consortia

    I advise cross-sector consortia, public–private partnerships, and multi-stakeholder initiatives where patient engagement spans industry, NGOs, academia, and policy makers.

    These environments often carry heightened complexity, blurred accountability, and competing incentives.

    This includes:

    - Clarifying governance and decision authority across stakeholders

    - Identifying ethical, reputational, and legitimacy risks arising from shared ownership

    - Stress-testing participation models before formal commitments or funding decisions

    - Supporting alignment where patient engagement is central to the initiative’s credibility

    My role is to ensure that patient-led approaches remain responsible, transparent, and defensible across stakeholder boundaries.

  • People crossing a street at a zebra crosswalk, some with umbrellas, under a dark sky.

    For Policy makers and Public Institutions

    I work with policy makers, public institutions on the ethical and governance implications of patient engagement in policy and system design.

    This includes:

    - Advising on frameworks for responsible patient engagement at system level

    - Supporting policy development where patient-led approaches are embedded into regulation

    - Reviewing participation models for legitimacy, accountability, and unintended consequences

    My role is to support clarity, foresight, and responsible decision-making.